Week 5: The Gross Estate
Outline (c) 1998 Robert H. Daniels
Review of Week 4
An introduction to transfer tax. Statistics regarding the limited but heavy reach of the US system. Discussion of problems with rate structure and effect on behavior patterns. Very general overview of some of the common avoidance techniques. The three exemption rules: spouse and charity, gifts of $10,000 per year, the lifetime exemption. Procedural requirements.

![]()
1. Gift and Estate Tax Unification
given an estate tax, need a gift tax
"in contemplation of death" hopelessly subjective
if they aren't unified, plan under the more favorable
e.g. if gift rules more favorable, then who pays estate tax?
those w/o tax planning
- those dying suddenly
- those w/too little $ to give it away
Unification makes it a tax on cumulative transfers
mechanics
add each year's taxable transfers to prior
calculate total tax
and subtract prior year taxes paidProvisions that implement the unification:
2001(b): estate added to prior taxable gifts
less "aggregate" tax on post-'76 gifts2012: gift tax Cr for estate tax
(on gifts included in estate)2055 and 2056 (charity and spouse) parallel 2522 and 2523
Why its only "semi-unification"
no estate tax equivalent
$10 K per donor/donee/year: Sec. 2503(b)
2503(d) for education and medicalestate tax has administration, funeral expenses
these are hardly "voluntary", thoTax Inclusive (Gift) vs. Tax Exclusive (Estate)
Is the tax charged on the assets used to pay the tax?
Example
Assume the $625K credit already used up, in effect
D has $1mm available to transferIf Gift, tax is 284,965, transfer net is 715,035
solve for x, where x + tax on x = $1mmIf estate, tax is $410,000, transfer net is $590,000
tax on 1,625,000 = $410,000
![]()
2. The Gross Estate (Chap. 15)
Sec. 2031 definition of The Gross Estate
"Value at time of death of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated"
This is just the starting point!
General attitude of courts had limited the reach of "all property"
Tps tried to control while avoiding legal "ownership"
Result: a number of extending code sections
"all you own and much that you don't"
Estate includes, generally, the value of the potential impairment of the ownership by others that is removed by D's death
The value of the cloud that passes away with D
Value:
Amplifying Regulations 20.2031-0 to -9
2031(b) for unlisted stock
Consider exchange listed comparables "in addition to all other factors"
Special valuation rules
Sec. 2032 Alternate valuation date
Sec. 2032A Farm use valuation
New Sec. 2033A: CHB valuationSec. 2033: All Property "To the Extent of D's interest at time of death"
"Property" rights are a fairly broad item
Estate tax uses accrual concepts for "extent of interest"
Regs. 20.2033-1 eg's
Items protected from creditors: homestead = property
Notes and claims, even if cancelled by will
eg. I forgive the $50 K son owns me
Interest and rents accrued at death
Dividends declared (X-div) but not received = propertyFirst Victoria Bank case: Regulatory Rights
Rights coming into existence at death
Employee Benefits
in estate if employee had vested rights w/o death
eg. pension w/ survivor benefit
or if employee can designate who getsPartnership interests: Riegelman case
Wrongful Death claims
Conn. Bank case: a right arising at death is not "property owned at death"
note that life ins. is covered separately
Other Sorts of "Property"
Rights to receive income: IRD items are property
Contingent interests: value as best you can
3. Joint Tenancy Interests: Sec. 2040 and Chap. 16
Distinguish tenants in common and community property
Features of joint tenancy
equal rights of present control, survivorship, right of severance
is a joint account really something else?
What income tax consequences of joint account?
Neel case
Sec. 2040: 4 possibilities
rights of both acquired by gift/inherit: 1/2 (1/3, etc. in estate)
eg./ property to Kids A and B, jointly
H and W are the joint tenants: 1/2 in estate per 2040(b)
includes "tenancy by the entireties" (not exist in CA)
Note income tax interaction: No step-up for survivor's half
Include entire value in first estate
This is the default case
Rationale: B gets all if B survives, 0 if A survives. The Cloud on B's ownership equals the value of all
Unless survivor contributed part of cost
then allocate value proportionately
gift by D to survivor used to purchase JT: not considered survivor's contribution
Goldsboro case
Problem of proving who paid what, esp principal payments on mortgage
RR 79-302 Joint tenancy w/ mortgage debt
total up down payment and mortgage payment made by each.
Divide mortgage balance at death equally among the JT'sNote that no present value factors allowed, nor is question of who paid the interest
Possibility of double-counting
see. Para. 16,079: simultaneous death
All in 1 estate and half in another estate
Now would only apply to non-HW situationsPlanning for joint tenancies
They avoid probate, but cause transfer tax problems
very common in CAFor HW in CA, community property much better
Half still included, but double stepup
H-W comm property: expedited probate proceduresCan you argue that a JT created with community funds is "really" community property?
For non-HW, inclusion can be an avoidable disaster
Eg. P creates JT w/ C in 1970: FMV 100K
FMV now $1mm
P dies: $ 1 mm in estate.
(Less what C paid w/ C's funds as % of all pmtsConsider effect of severing JT
? more gift tax? NO: transfer was completed gift
C had right to sever all along.Tenancy in common: $500K included in estate
Price: lose step up on 1/2 the property
![]()
Build Date 2/24/98