|
Communication 321: Communication in the Virtual Group Spring 2008 M W 10:00 – 11:50 in ASC 240
Instructor: Elaine Chan Office: Ph.D. Office Hours: M W 12:00 – 1:00, and by appointment
Course Description Over the course of the semester we will be examining the social and psychological effects of computer-mediated communication and its associated technologies and cultures. The readings in the course include individual, group, and community-level phenomenon, and often are empirically-based. The goal of the course is to provide the student a broad overview of theories and research concerning communication online.
Course Materials
Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., and Tomic, A. (2004) Computer-Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. Los Angeles: Sage. You can purchase it online at Amazon.com and elsewhere.
Other required readings (mostly articles) will be made available to you via Blackboard or hyperlinks. Assigned readings are subject to change – please check the schedule of classes regularly for the most updated version.
Components of the Course Grade:
· Blog posts and comments – personal posts based on course readings on assigned weeks (300-500 words) 16% and comments on other students’ postings on other weeks 16% [course blog] · Assignments – four, 1-2 page assignments 30% [assignments] · Class participation - based on contributions to in-class discussion 10% · Final paper – students will have the opportunity to do research on an online medium or community of their choice, 8-10 pages 28%
Blog Postings and Comments: Students will sign up for assigned weeks (3 or 4) on which they will submit blog post commentaries on the readings for the upcoming week (300-500 words). Good commentaries will: - focus on all of the readings for the upcoming week - do not merely summarize, but focus instead on an evaluating the readings - identify 3-4 questions for discussion during the class meeting (focus on the papers’ key issues, strengths and limitations, and a comparison to previous weeks’ readings). Postings should be made to the class blog by 10pm on the Friday before we will discuss the assigned readings.
On other (unassigned) weeks, each student should post comments (min. 125 words) to their fellow students’ blog commentary. Excellent comments can offer a critique of that week’s posting, seek clarification, compare or contrast postings, or provide additional evidence or new information (such as a link to a related article, website, etc.). ***[Update / Clarification as of 1/30) In addition to responses to a fellow classmate's blog post, you can create new posts to the blog (for example, an interesting article, podcast, video, website that relates in some way to the topics in our course. Comments to these additional postings are also encouraged and rewarded.*** Each student must contribute a minimum of 15 comments. Students can earn credit for a maximum of two comments each week.
Class Participation: Good participation in class discussion extremely similar to good comments in a blog thread, without a specific word limitation. Note that you must attend class in order to participate.
Final Paper: Throughout the semester you will be tracking one or two online sites / communities that are interesting to you. Your paper should include both material from the course readings and independent research in your analysis of the site. More information about final paper specifications will be provided later in the semester.
Academic Integrity Policy
The School of Communication is committed to the highest standards of academic excellence and ethical support. It endorses and acts on the school policies and procedures detailed in the SCampus section titled: "University Student Conduct Code." See especially Appendix A: "Academic Dishonesty Sanction Guidelines." The policies, procedures, and guidelines will be assiduously upheld. They protect your rights, as well as those of the faculty. It is particularly important that you are aware of and avoid plagiarism, cheating on exams, fabricating data for a project, submitting the same paper to more than one professor, or submitting a paper authored by anyone but yourself. If you have questions about any of these matters, confer with the instructor.
Academic Accommodation based on Disability
Any student requesting academic accommodation based on a disability is required to register with Disability Services and Programs (DSP) each semester. A letter of verification for approved accommodations can be obtained from DSP. Please be sure the letter is delivered to the instructor as early in the semester as possible. DSP is located in STU 301 and is open 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The phone number for DSP is (213) 740-0776.
Schedule of Classes
MONDAY JANUARY 14 INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
WEDNESDAY JANUARY 16 ONLINE COMMUNICATION MEDIA · Scholz, T. (2007). A history of the social web. · Pew Internet and American Life: Activities Americans Have Ever Done Online. · Activities Americans Do Each Day
MONDAY JANUARY 21 NO CLASS
WEDNESDAY JANUARY 23 CMC AS NEW TECHNOLOGY · TLT, pages 1-7, 14-33, 75-79, 163-169, 181-186, 228-231 Click for readings
MONDAY JANUARY 28 MEDIA RICHNESS · TLT, pages 45-57 · Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.[PDF] ** ASSIGNMENT # 1 DUE **
WEDNESDAY JANUARY 30 SELF DISCLOSURE · TLT, pages 58-80 · Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity.
MONDAY FEBRUARY 4 LANGUAGE · TLT, pages 118-128 · Walther, J. B., & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19 (3), 323-345. [PDF] · Browse NetLingo The Internet Dictionary
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 6 IMPRESSION FORMATION · Jacobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html
MONDAY FEBRUARY 11 IDENTITY / SELF-REPRESENTATION · TLT, pages 95-106 · Boyd, D. & Heer, J. (2006) Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. http://www.danah.org/papers/HICSS2006.pdf · Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.html
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 13 ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS I · TLT, pages 137-142. · Madden, M. & Lenhart, A. (2006). Online Dating. Pew Internet & American Life. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf
MONDAY FEBRUARY 18 NO CLASS
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 20 ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS II · Hitch, G., Hortacsu, A. & Ariely, D. (2006). What makes you click: An empirical analysis of online dating. http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2006/0106_0800_0502.pdf · Egan, J. (2003). Love in the time of no time. New York Times Magazine.
MONDAY FEBRUARY 25 AVATARS · Yee, N. & Bailenson, J.N. (2007). The Proteus Effect: The Effect of Transformed Self-Representation on Behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271-290. · Labi, N. (2007). An IM infatuation turned to romance. Then the truth came out. Wired. http://www.wired.com/politics/law/magazine/15-09/ff_internetlies (optional but recommended) ** PAPER PROPOSAL DUE **
WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 27 ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR · TLT, pages 148-159 · Wikipedia article on Megan Meier suicide controversy · Zetter, K. (2007). Cyberbullying suicide stokes the Internet fury machine. Wired. http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2007/11/vigilante_justice and follow-up
MONDAY MARCH 3 ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR II · Foo, C.Y. & Koivisto, E.M.I. (2004). Defining grief play in MMORPGS: Player and developer perceptions. ACM International Conference Proceedings. [PDF] · Anderssen, E. (2007, September 7). Frontier justice: Can virtual worlds be civilized? Globe and Mail. ** ASSIGNMENT # 2 DUE **
WEDNESDAY MARCH 5 COMPULSIVE USE · Griffiths, M. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 3(2), 211-218. [PDF] · Payne, J.W. (2006, November 14). Caught in the web: More people say heavy internet use is disrupting their lives, and medical experts are paying attention. · Alter, A. (2007). Is this man cheating on his wife? Wall Street Journal Online. August 10, 2007.
MONDAY MARCH 10 COMPULSIVE USE II (cooperation moved) · Yellowlees, P. M. & Marks, S. (2007). Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1447-1453. [PDF] · Walther, J. B. & Reid, L. D. (2000). Understanding the Allure of the Internet. Originally published in Chronicle of Higher Education, February 4, 2000. Available at http://www.rpi.edu/dept/NewsComm/Renss_news/addiction.html
WEDNESDAY MARCH 12 RELATIONSHIP QUALITY · Cummings, J., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.[PDF]
MONDAY MARCH 17 & WEDNESDAY MARCH 19 NO CLASS – SPRING RECESS
MONDAY MARCH 24 SOCIAL NETWORKING · Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
WEDNESDAY MARCH 26 SOCIAL NETWORKING · Rosen, C. (2007). Virtual friendship and the new narcissism. The New Atlantis. Summer 2007, 15-31. · Doctorow, C. (2007). How your creepy ex-co-workers will kill Facebook. Information Week.
MONDAY MARCH 31 PRIVACY I · Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., Carter, C., (2000). Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Trust_Privacy_Report.pdf
WEDNESDAY APRIL 2 PRIVACY II · Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9), http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html ** ASSIGNMENT # 3 DUE **
MONDAY APRIL 7 ONLINE COMMUNITY I · Baym, N. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community, (pp. 35-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [PDF]
WEDNESDAY APRIL 9 ONLINE COMMUNITY II · TLT, p. 107-117. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A. Q., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., de Diaz, I. I., et al. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/wellman.html
MONDAY APRIL 14 PLAYING TOGETHER · Wired Travel Guide: Second Life (2006)
WEDNESDAY APRIL 16 PLAYING TOGETHER II · Steinkuehler, C. A., and Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as "third places." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/steinkuehler.html · My virtual life. (2006). Business Week.
MONDAY APRIL 21 THE VIRTUAL COMMONS · Kollock, P. & Smith, M. (1996) Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. OR · Kollock, P. (1998) Design Principles for Virtual Communities.
WEDNESDAY APRIL 23 THE EVERYDAY INTERNET · Ling, R. & Yttri, B. (2002). Hypercoordination. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.) Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University. [PDF] · Bakardjieva, M. and Smith, R. (2001). The Internet in Everyday Life. New Media and Society 3(1) 67-83.[PDF] ** ASSIGNMENT # 4 DUE **
MONDAY APRIL 28 PRESENTATIONS
WEDNESDAY APRIL 30 ** FINAL PAPER DUE **
|