Dear Friends: Our 2004 Was a Nightmare
By Jeffrey Zaslow
Tired of the Bragging, Some Try Reality
'I Probably Over-Disclosed'
December 9, 2004; Page D1
Here's a risk you take when you send out your annual family holiday letter: Recipients might gather in small groups to read it aloud and laugh at you.
That's what happens in a
neighborhood in
Meanwhile, in
The traditional holiday letter is getting a makeover. Weary from decades of receiving photocopied self-aggrandizement, some people are mounting a backlash against all the bragging and gushing. As a result, divorce, job loss, drug abuse and other less-cheery topics are showing up with greater frequency in these normally upbeat missives. This trend toward "reality holiday letters" is also a response to a broader culture of Web logs, tell-all celebrities and reality TV that makes it more acceptable to air dirty laundry.
His brother was among the 100 or so recipients, and never responded. "But he's divorced now, and we're communicating better," Mr. Alexander says.
Last year, in her family's
Christmas letter, 24-year-old Sarah Budd of
Many reality letter-writers, however, can't help but sugarcoat their revelations. If Junior's drug problem is mentioned, he's dealing with it courageously. If Grandmom died, she was a magnificent woman and the family is mourning her honorably. If the family dog was given away because the irresponsible kids weren't caring for it, the "beloved" animal is better off at its new home with the giant yard.
Almost all holiday letters are
"fraudulent in a sense," says Stephen Banks, a
In some ways, idealized reality letters are appropriate. "We live in confusing times, and holiday letters are a way for people to build a coherent autobiography of their families, so they don't feel bad about their histories," says Prof. Banks. But reality holiday letters require a careful balancing act -- honesty without full disclosure.
H. Paul Shuch,
of
The changing tone of holiday letters can create awkward moments. Since kindergarten, Ms. Budd has written sections for her family's annual letter. As she has matured and been more forthcoming about her triumphs and travails, she sometimes feels overexposed. Distant relatives at family reunions "know all these incredible details from my life," she says. "I know it's from these letters."
Many of his 300 recipients marvel
at his multipage musings. "His letters challenge
me to be more reflective about my own life," says his friend, Matt Stenson
of
Still, Mr. Mehrotra is adamant about sharing his lowest moments with his mailing list. "There's something really insincere about involving people in all your good news, and then not leveling with them."
Back in the 20th century, when photocopiers first allowed families to slip mass-produced form letters into their Christmas cards, most were newsy updates written in a quasi-journalistic voice. They had familiar undercurrents: gratitude for life's joys, determination to overcome setbacks, and sappy recitations about swell vacations and precocious kids.
The backlash against people who
send only good news has been growing since 1998. That's when an Ann Landers
column railed against "ghastly" holiday letters in which people brag
about their incredible homes and Ivy League-bound children. Pamela
Now, to help would-be braggarts
keep themselves in check, Ms.
The McDavids, whose sons have disabilities, want their holiday letters to give a sense of their lives to friends who wonder why they don't go out to dinner or the movies much. Their letters are straightforward, but poignant. In 2001, they wrote of their son with autism: "In some ways, it is more heartbreaking when his medications are in balance and he can try [to be understood verbally]. We can see the person who is trapped inside that miserable, messed-up neurology, and we still can't free him."
Their letters are "very naked," says Ms. McDavid, "but you always feel better after you write from the heart."
• E-mail: Jeffrey.Zaslow@wsj.com. Read Moving On columns at CareerJournal.com.