CINE 407 Paper Topics

Assignment One:

  1. Catherine Soussloff discusses the significance of the artist’s body. (pg. 133) Why is this crucial to the delineation of the term “artist?” How might this relate to the construction of Van Gogh as an archetypal figure of the artist? And how might films such as Lust for Life and Vincent and Theo play on this common attribute found in the biography of artists. 
  2. Much has been made of Van Gogh’s Crows in a Wheat-field, 1890. Discuss Kurosawa’s composition in the closing moments of his Van Gogh vignette in his film Dreams. What is the significance of this composition coming at the close of the vignette? How does Kurosawa seem to interpret crows? Do you think Pollock would agree with Kurosawa’s interpretation? And how might this compare to other cinematic representations of Crows in a Wheat-field (e.g., Lust for Life, Vincent and Theo). 
  3. Tweedie says that Caravaggio’s “tableaux vivants [living tableaus] … represent an act of critical hermeneutics [interpretation].” What is revealed in Jarman’s staging of these tableaux vivants? And what might these reveal about cinema? Why does Tweedie call these “protocinematic”?
  4. In James Tweedie’s article he discusses how Jarman’s film, Caravaggio, might rediscover “identities submerged beneath dominant histories.” What histories (note that the term is plural here) are potentially unearthed? How might this compare to last week’s discussion of Pollock’s article? In what ways might the selected clip from Jarman’s film compare to the Potato Eater sequence in Lust for Life? How might they be similar, and/or how might they be different?
  5. Susan Felleman concludes her article by arguing that despite the feminist potential in the cinematic representations of female artists, such as Artemisia, the tendency is to construct the “female imagination [as] deformed by pathology.” What so-called ‘pathologies’ might we attribute to Agnès Merlet’s depiction of Gentileschi? How does this differ from the biographical models that we’ve seen thus far (e.g., Van Gogh and Caravaggio)? Or does it differ at all, has Merlet adopted common tropes associated with male artists and superimposed them over the biographical representation of Gentileschi?
  6. Nochlin says that the two reactions to the question, “why have there been no great women artists?” is to attempt to first address the question as it is put, and/or to establish “a different kind of ‘greatness’ for women’s art than for men’s, thereby postulating the existence of a distinctive and recognizable feminine style …”  Does Merlet Artemisia attempt to do this, that is, establish Artemisia Gentileschi’s ‘greatness’ as distinctively feminine? Or does Merlet attempt to establish Gentileschi’s ‘greatness’ as ‘different’? Does Merlet in some way “tacitly reinforce” the dominant patriarchal regime?
  7. Carlos Saura says that had Goya lived today “he would be a filmmaker.”  Explain why Saura draws this conclusion. What painterly qualities are evident in this scene in Goya? What is added to these ‘painterly’ qualities? Considering that the image is probably a reference to Rembrandt’s Slaughtered Ox (1638), what is the possible significance of the morphing from the carcass to Goya? What possible connotations might be drawn about the biography of Goya and his significance in art history?
  8. Some ‘cinematic purest’ might argue that a theatrical mise-en-scene is pointless because it doesn’t take full advantage of the cinematic medium, and tends to reduce the cinematic to a recording of a theatrical drama on film.  Why does Saura adopt a theatrical mise-en-scene in Goya? As a filmmaker what possible advantages does this afford him? Despite the overt theatricality of the sequence, what uniquely cinematic elements are used? The selected sequence is working towards the final shot of the 1798 fresco depicting the Miracle of St Anthony of Padua in the Hermitage church of St Antonio de la Florida, Madrid, how does the previous theatricality inform our understanding of Goya’s painting?

Second Assignment

Students will be required to write a paper (4 - 5 pages). You must incorporate one source from your reading material, in addition to one outside scholarly resource. Due in class December 6th.

For assistance with citations see the online version of Diana Hacker's A Pocket Style Manual.

  1. Compare the representation of Jackson Pollock in Hans Namuth's film Pollock, and Ed Harris's feature film Pollock.
    1. How are these films similar?
    2. What type of 'character' do these films construct for Pollock? That is, who do they make Jackson Pollock out to be?
    3. To what extent do these films rely on traditional biographic tropes of the artist to construct 'Jackson Pollock'?
  2. Despite Linda Nochlin's essay, "Why have there been no great women artists?" does Julie Taymor's film Frida, fall precisely into the traps she warns against?
    1. Does Taymor "swallow the bait, hook, line and snicker, and … attempt to address the question as it is put,"1 with her film Frida?
    2. Does Taymor attempt to construct a "recognizable feminine style,"2 in Frida's character or work?
    3. Or, does Taymor somehow manage to navigate around these potential pitfalls?
  3. Compare the opening scenes of Pollock and Basquiat.
    1. How are these scenes similar?
    2. What is the significance of Picasso in these scenes?
    3. What is the possible significance of the young Basquiat standing before Guernica and having a crown 'magically' appear over his head?
  4. Francis Bacon's work is influenced by cinema and photography (especially Muybridge) and his painting has in-turned influenced filmmakers such as Bernardo Bertolucci and Peter Greenaway.
    1. How does Bacon's work inform the mise-en-scene of Bertolucci's The Last Tango in Paris?
    2. How might the selected sequence from Love is the Devil compare to Bertolucci's film?
    3. In what possible way might we trace Bertolucci and Bacon back to Muybridge?
  5. Compare the performance/video art from Sessions 10 & 11. Select no more than 2 pieces from each column.
    1. How are these works similar?
    2. What makes them different?
    3. How do these works treat social conventions in relation to gender and/or sexuality?
    4. Session 10
      Session 11
      Faith Wilding Waiting
      Andy Warhol, Blow Job
      Linda Montano, Mitchell's Death
      Chris Burden Shoot, Through the Night Softly, Velvet Water
      Martha Rosler, Semiotics of the Kitchen
      Chris Cunningham,  Flex selected sequence from Widowlicker
      Annie Sprinkle, Public Cervix Announcement
      Paul McCarthy, The Garden or Cultural Gothic
      Orlan
      Matthew Barney, selection from Cremaster Cycle [from Cremaster 3, and from Cremaster 4]
      Shirin Neshat, Turbulent

      Cindy Sherman,
      Untitled 35 (1979), Untitled 54 (1980), Untitled 175 (1987)


  6. Peter Greenaway's film A Zed and Two Noughts is about 'beginnings and endings.' Discuss how Greenaway's film situates the origins of cinema in painting, specifically Johannes Vermeer's work.
    1. How does Greenaway use Vermeer in A Zed and Two Noughts?  (For a possible comparison see Vermeer's The Art of Painting,  1666-67.)
    2. How might this compare to A Girl with a Pearl Earring?
  7. In the postwar era the struggle for Japanese identity not only came from outside pressures (e.g., American influence during the Occupation) but also from within. The artwork that emerged in the postwar era frequently engaged the contentious issue of Japanese identity (e.g., Hijikata's Butoh, Eiko Hosoe's Navel and A-Bomb). Discuss how Teshigahara's Woman in the Dunes [clip 1, 2] engages the Japanese identity.
    1. Discuss how the various figures in the film (e.g., the sand, the pit, the villagers) are used as representative of the supposed crisis in Japanese identity.
    2. If it is useful compare elements in Woman in the Dunes to Navel and A-Bomb.
  8. "'Superflatness,' is an original concept," Murakami Takashi proclaims; where Japanese people "have been completely westernized."3 Murakami's theory of Super Flat is at once an embrace of Japanese historical/cultural discontinuity, and at the same time an attempt to construct an unbroken nexus of Japanese history and culture. How does Anno Hideaki's Love and Pop fit within Murakami's conception of Super Flat?
    1. For a possible point of comparison see the following clip from Ozu's Early Summer.
    2. For a possible point of comparison see the following clip from Anno's Neon Genesis Evangelion.
  9. Hideaki Anno is adopting his style and content directly from (shojo) manga. Discuss how the content and the style inform the Love and Pop and its composition.
    1. How might manga be informing the editing?
    2. How might manga be informing the camera angles?
    3. How might the content of the narrative be related to the discourse of shojo manga?

 



1. Linda Nochlin, "Why have there been no great women artists?" in Art and Its Histories: A Reader, Steve Edwards, ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 154.
2. Nochlin, 155.<>
3. Takashi Murakami, "Superflat Manifesto," Superflat, exhibition catalog (Tokyo: MADRA publishing, 2000), 5.


return to the home page