Geog 621/721. Final Project
We've learned a great deal this semester, I think you'll agree, so it would be nice to
put some of this to work on a real project. That's the purpose of the final project
portion of this class. So where do we start?
- The first step would be to pick a study area with data we can use. You should
know by now some of the data you might have available. You may find
You will find resources on the web, but it can be challenging to find good data. You might network with other students in the class, some of whom either work or have contacts at resource
agencies in the Bay Area. As I find resources, I will include them on our
web site, under "Projects and Data".
- Then we'll need to decide what kind of analysis to do. This may come from
talking with other people working in the study area we choose e.g.
a watershed group, a resource agency, a local environmental organization
or from your own ideas. The reason we started with data is that we won't have
time to generate new data for this project you only have 3-4 weeks.
- Project Proposal: Submit a one to two page proposal for your project,
identifying your data sources and what you plan to do. Obviously your methods
should derive from what you've learned this semester, but don't hesitate to extend
these with additional tools (such as hydrological modeling).
721 students should make sure to include references.
- Now you do the project. Watch out for common pitfalls.
One requirement for the assignment is including either a model or a script.
This will (a) help you avoid mistakes; (b) let you test it out with different
data; (c) provide a record of your work (you'll be surprised at how much of
what you've done you'll forget after a project is done); (d) provide you with
a model that you can share with others; and (e) make it much easier for me
to evaluate what you did. Don't create any datasets beforehand that
are not included in the model or script. If you have a problematic dataset
that needs preparation beforehand, make sure to carefully document it in your
report, test it thoroughly -- I'll need to understand it to evaluate your
- Document all data sources. You should include in your report a list of all
data sources, with all of the essential metadata, especially:
a. Data source, agency or person who created the data.
b. Spatial reference: projection & coordinate system, including horizontal
and vertical units.
c. Process used to create the data, including anything you had to do to prepare
it for use. Ideally, you should have included preprocessing in your model.
e. Cell size
f. Attributes you are using.
- Create a map or two displaying the results.
- Write it up as a 4-7 page paper describing your project. Include the purpose
of the project, the process you used, and an analysis of the results. Make
sure to cite your sources, including web sources. Include a readableprintout
of any models or scripts. On a floppy disk, turn in any (1) .aml text
file, (2) ModelBuilder .xmd file, or (3) ArcView project file containing the
scripts. Clearly document your project, since I may have to find your
sources to evaluate your project.