|
Robin Kandel |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think a lot of it was carried over from the adults because as a kid you just feel what the atmosphere is around you. - Fred Kandel The various narratives that make up
Reconstructing Memories
are fragmentary. No narrative is complete. Through innocent neglect or
in an effort to ‘spare us’ the details, stories have been kept from us.
Katsushige Nakahashi had no idea that his father worked in Zero
maintenance crew, James Fee returns to Peleliu to fill-in the gaps in
his father’s narrative and there is something analogous in Robin
Kandel’s installation work. In her installation story 1: run, Kandel hoped to
recreate not only the details of her father’s story, but to also
approach the periphery of his experiences, to fill-in some of the gaps,
to reveal the things she knows and the things she thinks she knows. He [Kandel’s father] was
accompanied by his mother and younger brother, his grandfather and two
uncles, other members of his family, including his father, were killed
either while in hiding or because they refused to leave their home and
enter work camps. We didn’t talk much about my father’s childhood when
I was growing up. As I got older he occasionally mentioned some detail,
what the shelters in the woods looked like, for instance, or a raw
potato is edible. I believe he thought I knew the actual story, not my
vague and fragmented version. I thought I did too.
story
1: run – as are most the works in Reconstructing Memories – is an
attempt to reconcile a vague and fragmented memory, to piece together
those scattered details that the artist recalls. (A new installation,
which is a continuation of this video series, is included in the
exhibition at the Art Gallery, University of Hawai’i, Manoa.) Living in the forest provided some
protection, but it never guaranteed survival. “Food was begged for,
foraged and stolen,” Fred Kandel comments. “When members of the family
were killed, they were buried in the woods.” In Kandel’s installation
these words are transcribed and are underfoot, the remnants of human
life – human hair, and dirt – disturb and destabilize the visitor
precisely because of their abject connotations; referencing the dead
buried in the forest. The abject sensation Kandel provokes in the
spectator allows us to experience – albeit remotely – the tenuous grip
on life in the forest and the constant threat of death. Situated in this environment,
Kandel’s father can be heard – although only in a faint whisper –
detailing his experiences; of which a significant part was spent
literally running for his life. A video projection of running through
the forest adds yet another layer to the installation. The blur of
trees, the high contrast of the black and white footage, disorientating
and chaotic in the sporadic flashes of dark and light, approaches
something of Fred Kandel’s experience. story 1: run approaches that
frightful recognition of being discovered, of hearing gunshots just off
in the distance and that survival instinct setting in, that immediate
compulsion to run. For the Collapsing Histories exhibition
(which has since evolved into Reconstructing Memories) in Tokyo, 2004,
and the University of California Santa Cruz, 2003, Kandel explored
another dimension of her father’s narrative, in her story 2: postola. This
installation series, when contemplated further is inseparable from the
notion of survival and mortality, not only Fred Kandel’s, but also the
artist’s. Obviously her mortality is intimately connected to her
father’s, and strangely it is feet that metonymically signify survival
and mortality. Earlier I spoke of the texture
underfoot and the abject connotations of the dead as suggested by the
texture of the floor, but this is not the only significance to feet and
their connection to survival and mortality. When recounting the process
of making run, Kandel with
camera in-hand ran through the forest. “I scared myself a little,” she
comments, “but mostly I realized that I might be one of those ‘people
who just couldn’t keep up and remained behind.’ Of course, remaining
behind meant almost certain death.” The artist here is not only
confronting her father’s mortality, but her own. And it is the ability
to run, or not, which meant the difference between life and death. The endurance to run, to drop
everything in a single instant and run for your life was also closely
related to one’s ability to make shoes. Fred Kandel recounts: The shoes are called
postolas. The peasants in the area had it to an art form. We just made
crude versions. But when we were in an area that had birch trees we
would cut one inch wide and very long strips from the bark. And
whenever we had time we would weave shoes. They didn’t last long.
After 60 years Fred Kandel
remembers how to make postolas, this detail so vivid and emotionally
charged, is then filtered through the artist’s own vague and fragmented
memories of her father’s experience produces something very potent.
This act of creating postolas – this craft inscribed in Fred Kandel’s
mind – saved his life; and it made artist’s life possible. In such
lucid terms, do we ever witness our own mortality; do we ever witness
that catastrophic experience that might have precluded our very
existence? In run/dig, which is a continuation of
Kandel’s video series, the artist reconstructs other aspects of her
father’s wartime experience. Fred Kandel recounts in his audio-tape
testimony digging; digging for potatoes in farmers’ fields rummaging
for food, digging out subterranean shelters in the forest, and also
burying the dead in the forest. Presented in a split-screen, run/dig juxtaposes the act of
digging with running. At least at one level the two images seem to
contradict one another; while on the one hand digging out subterranean
shelters suggests a stationary existence and although undoubtedly rough
and ‘primitive’ these camps must have offered a relative sense of
stability, however juxtaposed to the video material depicting the act
of digging there is also scenes of running through the forest, the
comparison illustrates just how tenuous life must have been, how
relative safety could never be taken for granted and might disappear
and inspire the camp’s inhabitants to run for their lives. There is also something abject
about run/dig: the act of
digging too closely mixes life with death. The act of digging is
associated with the search for food and constructing shelter, but it is
also associated with burying the dead. Kandel places a vessel of water
in front of the monitor producing quite an unsettling affect. When
viewing the piece through the vessel of water, the split image reverses
sides; literally the image is destabilized, mixed together. Moreover,
the video image is viewed through water, typically associated as a
life-giving force. run/dig
perhaps more than the previous two video pieces, in its mixing of life
and death, directly negotiates/confronts the possibility of
non-existence. Recently the artist has been
exploring her mother’s background as well, in what she calls her
“mythological parentage.” As with most of us in the discourse of
family-lore there are often conflicting narratives, an aunt or uncle
might have a completely different take on particular events in family
history from one’s parents. Over the course of many years a story might
be embellished, exaggerated, distorted beyond recognition. How then do
we navigate through these divergent and potentially untrustworthy
narratives, how does one sort out fact from fiction, how does one
reconstruct a family history when there is disparity in the
recollection of an event? Specifically for Kandel she is interested in
the constitution of family-lore: while on the paternal side of the
family there is the harrowing tale of survival during the Second World
War, on the maternal side of the family there are possible links – or
so the family-lore has it – to the notorious Purple Gang. Kandel, like
all of us, has to work through her “mythological parentage” to
reconstruct her own family history.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return
Home |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||